Evergreen Fund Investment Guide 2025
Looking for a trusted network of high-net-worth peers? Apply now to join Long Angle, a vetted community where successful investors, entrepreneurs, and professionals connect. Access confidential discussions, live events, peer advisory groups, and curated investment opportunities.
Long Angle’s Evergreen Fund Investment Guide 2025 is a comprehensive introduction to private market evergreen funds. The guide defines the different types of evergreen investment vehicles, outlines key benefits for investors, and explains how to evaluate sponsors. It also clarifies common terminology and highlights performance characteristics to help readers more confidently evaluate if evergreen funds are a fit for their portfolio.
Table of Contents
Access the Full Investment Guide Here
What is an Evergreen Fund?
Evergreen funds offer private market investors a perpetual investment vehicle without predetermined termination dates.
Evergreen funds exist across private equity, private credit, real estate, and other private asset classes. Unlike conventional closed-end (drawdown) private market funds that operate on fixed 8-10 year lifecycles, evergreen funds allow investors to subscribe and redeem shares on a periodic basis—typically quarterly or semi-annually.
While traditional funds require investors to make upfront capital commitments that are drawn down over years, evergreen funds deploy capital immediately upon subscription—eliminating the commitment overhang and providing instant exposure to diversified private market portfolios.
For Limited Partners (LPs—investors who contribute capital), evergreens offer:
Full upfront capital deployment
Semi-liquidity
For General Partners (GPs—fund sponsors who manage the investment), evergreen funds allow:
Continuous fundraising
Better alignment with long-term strategies (no forced exits)
“Evergreen” is a broad term to describe any perpetual, semi-liquid investment vehicle. There are several types of evergreen funds:
Tender offer fund: a fund offering periodic liquidity by making tender offers to repurchase shares at NAV (liquidity is not guaranteed).
Interval fund: a fund that repurchases a set percentage of shares at NAV at predetermined intervals (often quarterly).
Non-traded Business Development Companies (BDCs): non-traded investment companies that make debt and equity investments.
Non-traded REITs: real estate investment trusts structured as evergreen vehicles.
ELTIFs/LTAFs: semi-liquid private funds for retail investors in Europe/UK.
According to Pitchbook, private evergreen fund AUM is expected to grow from $2.7T in 2024 up to $4.4T by 2029. That’s over a 10% CAGR, and stronger AUM growth compared to private drawdown funds. While evergreens only accounted for 14% of all private capital AUM in 2024, that share is expected to rise to 18% over the next five years.
Long Angle has participated in a few evergreen offerings, including:
Chicago Atlantic Credit Opportunities: private credit
KKR Private Equity Conglomerate: private equity
StepStone Private Markets (SPRIM): broad asset private market secondaries
StepStone Private Equity Strategies (STPEX): private equity secondaries
Why Invest in Evergreen Funds?
The following table provides a comparison between evergreen funds and traditional closed-end private market funds. For many investors, the liquidity and periodic fundraising advantages of evergreens make them the more attractive (and convenient) investment option.
However, investors should be aware that the liquidity offered by semi-liquid funds comes with marginally lower returns on deployed capital because a liquidity sleeve is invested in cash equivalent, low return liquidity sleeves (like treasuries).
Table 1. Evergreen vs. Traditional Private Market Funds
| Feature | Evergreen Fund | Traditional (Closed-End) Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Open-ended with no fixed maturity; investors can subscribe or redeem shares periodically (typically quarterly/semi–annually) | Fixed-life: usually 8-10 years—with defined investment, harvest (exit), and wind-down (final distribution) periods |
| Capital Commitment | Capital is typically drawn up-front (single close or periodic closes) | LPs commit some capital up front; GP calls capital over several years as investments are made |
| Liquidity | Offers periodic liquidity (quarterly or semi-annual) windows for redemptions, often capped | No interim liquidity: investors are locked in until portfolio exits and distributions occur |
| Fundraising | Ongoing fundraising: new investors can join at NAV during subscription windows | Raised once at launch: no new investors after final close |
| Diversification | Broad diversification: PE funds typically have 100+ portfolio company holdings1 | High concentration: PE funds generally only have 10-15 portfolio company holdings1 |
| Investment Minimums (for Individuals) | ~$5K-$25K for PE funds | ~$250K-$10M+ for PE funds |
| Total Expected Return | Slightly lower returns on deployed capital vs. drawdown funds because of the need to hold a liquidity sleeve for redemptions | Slightly higher returns on deployed capital vs. evergreens from being fully invested in illiquid, high-return private assets |
| Tax and Complexity | Simplified tax form: produces a 1099 or simplified K-1 | Long and complex K-1s if there are multiple capital calls over years, many state K-1s, multi-level structures, and multiple types of income or deductions |
Sources: Long Angle Investments; 1. Morgan Stanley Investment Management
Potential Downsides to Evergreens
Investors should also be aware of the potential downsides of evergreen investments:
Cash drag: evergreens keep a liquidity sleeve (cash, public equities, or liquid credit) to handle redemptions. This dilutes exposure to private markets and could lead to lower returns compared to being fully invested in drawdown funds. The extent of this drag depends on how much liquidity is being offered.
Valuation challenges: the net asset value (NAV) of an evergreen fund and its underlying assets are typically updated quarterly and rely on GP-reported valuations. In periods of market volatility, NAVs could lag reality.
Redemption gating: redemptions are usually capped at a certain percentage of NAV per quarter. In stressed markets, if the cap is hit fund managers invoke a gate where liquidity requests are either met pro rata or deferred to a later redemption window.
To illustrate these risks in practice, Blackstone’s Real Estate Income Trust (BREIT)—a semi-liquid, open-ended real estate fund—faced scrutiny in 2022 over its valuation methods, with critics noting a reliance on assumptive discounted cash flow models rather than appraisals or tight comparative property cap rate comparables. In December 2022, redemption requests surged amid broader concerns about real estate and BREIT’s outlook. Once requests exceeded the fund’s preset limits (2% of NAV monthly and 5% quarterly), Blackstone capped redemptions, fulfilling less than 10% of requests in December according to Blue Vault. Barron’s reported the gate meant only about 0.3% of BREIT’s $69 billion NAV was actually redeemed that month (about $200 million).
Incentive to deploy capital: managers are incentivized to have as little cash on hand as possible (outside the liquidity sleeve) because it drags down the returns of the fund. If fundraising outpaces deal flow, the manager could be incentivized to seek subpar investments to deploy capital sooner compared to a drawdown fund that only calls capital when an acquisition is in the pipeline.
Performance Characteristics
Even though evergreen funds are subject to some level of cash drag in order to provide liquidity, the return on committed capital benefits from full upfront deployment.
Full upfront deployment with evergreens allows compounding to begin on day one. This means evergreen funds require lower annualized returns on deployed capital to achieve the same multiple on invested capital (MOIC) as closed-end funds.
Hamilton Lane illustrates the compounding advantage of evergreens in the below chart, which compares the returns required by evergreen and closed-end structures to achieve the same MOIC. The analysis assumes an eight-year horizon, with unfunded capital and interim distributions of the closed-end fund both growing at a 5% interest rate annually. Under these assumptions, an evergreen fund that is fully deployed from day one would only need a 10% annualized return to grow capital by 2.1x. By contrast, a closed-end fund with dispersed capital calls would require a 16% internal rate of return (IRR) to reach the same outcome. The gap widens further with higher MOIC targets.
Figure 1: Evergreen vs. Closed-End Fund Returns Required for Same MOIC
Source: Hamilton Lane, Evergreen Funds and Private Wealth, 2025 Market Review
This is because it takes longer to deploy every dollar of the committed investment for a closed-end fund. For retail investors who don’t have an equally viable place to invest their capital while waiting for capital calls, this is essentially self-imposed cash drag waiting for drawdown deployment. Institutions and widely allocated private investors have many more tools to manage these drawdown schedules and thus typically opt for drawdown vehicles, while retail investors might prefer the evergreen offering.
Therefore when it comes to evergreens’ performance, a tradeoff exists between the cash drag negatively affecting returns and the benefit of full deployment compounding over time. Due to evergreens’ relatively recent emergence and many of the largest funds having launched within the last five years, analysis of performance over time is limited.
Hamilton Lane analyzed the annualized returns of 13 equity-focused evergreen funds between 2019 and 2024. They found that evergreen funds outperformed public markets (MSCI World public benchmark) and actually performed slightly better than closed-end private equity.
Figure 2: Annualized Returns Q3 2019 - Q3 2024
Source: Hamilton Lane, Evergreen Funds and Private Wealth, 2025 Market Review
Evergreen Performance by Asset Class
In a recent Pitchbook Analyst Note, the team analyzed one-year and five-year returns of evergreen funds across asset classes and compared them to public markets. Looking at one-year median returns through April 2025, evergreen strategies outperformed public markets. Private equity and infrastructure had the highest one-year median returns, albeit having smaller sample sizes.
Figure 3: One-Year Return Dispersion by Evergreen Fund Strategy
Source: Pitchbook, The Return of Evergreen Funds, Q2 2025 Analyst Note
For five-year returns, only private debt, real estate, and secondaries were analyzed due to data availability over the longer time horizon. Secondaries and private debt posted strong 50%+ five-year returns. While private debt outperformed public markets, real estate did not.
Figure 4: Five-year returns of select evergreen fund indexes
Source: Pitchbook, The Return of Evergreen Funds, Q2 2025 Analyst Note
In summary, while the above analyses are admittedly limited due to small sample sizes and/or short time horizons, they do provide early evidence for evergreen strategies outperforming alternatives.
High-Net-Worth Asset Allocation Report
Long Angle's annual high-net-worth asset allocation report presents the latest investment trends and strategies for portfolios ranging from high-net-worth to ultra-high-net-worth investors.
How to Evaluate Sponsors
Due diligence framework
Investors should carefully evaluate the following before committing capital:
Manager experience: deal sourcing, due diligence, portfolio construction approaches, operations. The manager’s ability to fundraise and manage the fund is critical.
Track record across market cycles: net returns, risk-adjusted returns, consistency across funds and vintage years, comparisons to benchmarks.
Valuation policy: how are the underlying assets valued and does it make sense given the overall market environment?
Realization record: to the point on valuation, how close is the manager’s record in evaluating the net asset value before disposition? The best managers realize returns well in excess of pre-sale valuations bolstering the investment thesis; the worst managers realize returns below where they hold the assets, significantly dragging the portfolio and drawing into question the validity of their marks.
The chart below is an analysis by StepStone that compares the top quartile, median, and bottom quartile of private equity fund managers and the premium or discount of the exit valuation to their evaluations 5 quarters prior (T-5Q). Anything over 0% means positive realized returns.
Figure 5. Exit Valuations vs. T-5Q Valuations
Source: StepStone Portfolio Analytics & Reporting; as of Q1 2025
Fees: It is important to take a close look at the underlying fee structure for all funds. An analysis by Hamilton Lane found that when accounting for carried interest, evergreen funds have a lower expense ratio to NAV than closed-end funds, typically due to most capital being invested immediately so investors aren’t paying fees on uninvested (committed) capital. Investors should be hyper aware of the total fee and expanse drag from any investments.
To learn about evergreen secondaries and how first close investors benefit from positive return arbitrage, read Long Angle’s Evergreen Secondaries Investment Guide 2025.
Long Angle members can reach out to the Long Angle Investments team with any questions on evergreen funds, due diligence, and opportunities to invest. Non-members can learn more about Long Angle at longangle.com and apply for membership here.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an evergreen fund?
Evergreen funds offer private market investors a perpetual investment vehicle without predetermined termination dates.
What are the benefits of investing in evergreen funds?
Full upfront capital deployment
Semi-liquidity
No fixed maturity
Ongoing fundraising
Broad diversification
How do evergreens perform compared to closed-end funds?
Full upfront deployment with evergreens allows compounding to begin on day one. This means evergreen funds require lower annualized returns on deployed capital to achieve the same multiple on invested capital (MOIC) as closed-end funds.
What should investors consider when evaluating evergreen fund sponsors?
Manager experience
Track record across market cycles
Valuation policy
Fees
Ready to connect with like-minded peers navigating similar wealth decisions?
Join Long Angle, a private community where successful entrepreneurs, executives, and professionals collaborate on wealth strategies, investment opportunities, and life's next chapter.
