Is Buying a Franchise Worth It? What the Model Looks Like From the Inside
Written By: Ryan Morrison.
Based on a Navigating Wealth conversation with Andy Louis-Charles.
2026 High-Net-Worth Asset Allocation Report
See how high-net-worth investors with an average net worth of $17M are allocating across public equities, private markets, real estate, bonds and cash. Based on benchmark data from 230+ respondents.
Most people who think about franchising picture a fast food restaurant. That association is understandable, and it is also the reason franchising gets dismissed by the people for whom it might be most interesting. Andy Louis-Charles spent eight years as Chief Strategy Officer at Custom Ink, had a private equity-backed liquidity event in 2019, and has spent the years since building a thesis around franchising as a capital deployment and wealth-building model that is widely misunderstood by high earners. His argument is not that franchising is for everyone. It is that the version of franchising most people imagine is not the version worth considering.
Buying a franchise is worth it when the model is chosen carefully: service, wellness, or B2B categories with 20 to 30 percent operating margins, rather than the quick-service restaurants that dominate public perception. At 10 to 25 units, a well-run multi-unit franchise can produce a low-eight-figure business with multiple millions in operating profit. The model works best for operators who execute playbooks well, not entrepreneurs who want to reinvent them.
Key Takeaways
Over 65% of franchise units are quick-service restaurants, but QSR tends to have sub-10% operating margins; service, wellness, and B2B franchises regularly reach 20 to 30%
Franchising flips the employment model: instead of an employer keeping most of the output and paying the worker a fraction of it, the franchisee keeps the majority of revenue and pays the brand a 5 to 10% royalty
The ideal franchisee is not the entrepreneur. It is the disciplined operator who executes a playbook, which is why military veterans consistently outperform
The wealth-building sweet spot is 10 to 25 units: achievable, manageable, and capable of producing a legacy business without becoming an institution
White collar workers displaced by AI represent a coming wave of franchise owners, and the shift from employment to ownership is already beginning
Why Franchising Gets Dismissed, and Why That Is a Mistake
Mention franchising to almost anyone and the first image that comes to mind is a restaurant. That is a reasonable association: more than 65% of franchise units in the US are quick-service restaurants. Ray Kroc's success scaling McDonald's through franchising was significant enough that an entire industry concluded restaurants and franchising were the same thing.
That conclusion misses the actual lesson. Franchising is a cost-efficient, scalable way to grow a brand. It has nothing inherently to do with food service. Service businesses, fitness and wellness brands, B2B sales organizations, and staffing operations can all be franchised, often with far better economics than the restaurant model that shaped public perception of the category.
The status problem compounds the misunderstanding. Buying a franchise carries a connotation of buying a job rather than building something original, which makes it feel like a step down for anyone with the capital and ambition to do something more ambitious. The categories considered low status tend to produce higher financial outcomes precisely because fewer capable people are looking at them. High status options pay out lower returns because everyone is competing for them.
The comparison that clarifies this: imagine someone with a software product asking whether to put it on a CD-ROM and sell it in retail stores, or deliver it over the internet. The cloud-based model is obviously better, yet a large share of businesses are still operating the equivalent of the CD-ROM version of growth. They are trying to scale by reinvesting their own profit dollar by dollar instead of using a model built specifically for distributed, capital-efficient expansion.
Watch the Full Conversation
This article draws on a Navigating Wealth conversation with Andy Louis-Charles, where we discuss why franchising deserves more serious consideration than its reputation suggests, what makes a business franchiseable, and why the AI displacement wave may make franchise ownership one of the more important wealth-building paths of the next decade. Watch the full episode for the broader discussion.
Subscribe on YouTube · Get weekly episode updates
Andy Louis-Charles spent eight years as Chief Strategy Officer at Custom Ink, helping grow the company to a successful private equity-backed liquidity event in 2019. Since then, he has focused on franchising, identifying businesses with the traits that make a strong franchise candidate and helping operators scale through multi-unit ownership. He describes himself as a franchise maximalist.
How Franchising Works: The Economics of Flipping the Employment Model
The clearest way to understand how franchising works is to compare it to the employment relationship it replaces.
In a standard employer-employee arrangement, the two parties want structurally opposed things. The employer wants more output for less pay. The employee wants more pay for less output. Consider a tech company generating a million dollars of revenue per employee. The company pays that employee a fraction of the value they generate and keeps the rest, while the employee continually wants more compensation, better tools, and improved working conditions, none of which the employer wants to fund out of the difference.
Franchising structurally flips this. Instead of the brand keeping most of the revenue and paying the operator a salary, the operator (now a franchisee) keeps the large majority of revenue from their unit and pays the brand a royalty, typically 5 to 10% of gross revenue. The franchisee covers their own costs, makes their own hiring decisions within brand standards, and keeps what is left.
In exchange for that royalty, the franchisee receives a protected territory, an established brand, an operating playbook, ongoing support, and access to a network of fellow franchisees navigating similar challenges. The analogy that captures this best is a university. Tuition buys access to a credential, a network, and a system, the value of which compounds as the institution's reputation grows. A strong franchise brand works the same way: every unit that performs well strengthens the brand for every other franchisee, and the resale value of being part of an established system is real.
Most franchise licensing agreements run for ten years and are typically renewed for franchisees who perform well, giving operators a long runway to build value in a protected market.
The Categories Worth Looking At, and the One to Avoid
The category a franchise operates in matters more than the strength of the brand name attached to it.
Quick-service restaurants, despite being the public face of franchising, tend to run sub-10% operating margins. Some concepts perform better, but the majority leave little cushion for a difficult year, rising labor costs, or an underperforming location. The category that built franchising's reputation is, by Andy Louis-Charles's account, one of the categories least suited to it.
Service-based franchises tell a different story. Home services, senior care, childcare enrichment, and pet care businesses routinely post operating margins in the 20 to 30% range. B2B franchise models exist as well and are less widely recognized as franchises at all. The Entrepreneurial Operating System, a popular business management framework, operates its network of implementer coaches as a franchise structure. Wellness and fitness brands can also produce strong unit economics when the underlying business model is sound.
| Franchise Category | Typical Operating Margin | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Quick-service restaurants | Sub-10% | Fast food, quick casual dining |
| Home and senior services | 20-30% | Home repair, senior care, cleaning |
| Childcare and enrichment | 20-30% | Tutoring, childcare centers, youth programs |
| B2B and staffing | 20-30%+ | Sales organizations, staffing, consulting frameworks |
| Wellness and fitness | Varies, often 20%+ | Gyms, recovery and wellness studios |
A useful filter for any category: every market tends to have room for roughly three positions. There is the premium brand, the low-cost provider, and a distinctive or unconventional option that carves out its own space. Anything beyond third place in a given category functions as a copycat, competing on margin rather than positioning. Franchise concepts worth serious consideration are the ones with a credible path to one of those three spots, not the fourth or fifth player chasing market share from behind.
Beyond Wealth Newsletter
Weekly perspectives on money, meaning, and the decisions that come after the financial ones get easier. Read by founders, executives, and investors navigating the same questions covered in this post.
What Makes a Business Franchiseable
For founders evaluating whether to franchise their own business, three criteria determine viability.
The business needs a proven unit of one: at least a year of operating history with revenue approaching seven figures and clean financials demonstrating the model works in a single location before anyone tries to replicate it elsewhere.
Operating margins need to clear roughly 15%, with 20% or higher being the stronger threshold. Below that, there is not enough margin in the unit economics to support both a thriving franchisee and a sustainable royalty stream for the brand.
The concept needs genuine replicability. A business that depends on a hyper-local condition (a niche outdoor activity tied to a specific climate, for example) does not translate into the 100-plus markets a real franchise system needs to reach scale. Category-defining or category-creating concepts hold up better than businesses entering an already-crowded field from behind.
For founders whose businesses meet these criteria but who cannot fund organic growth through retained earnings alone, franchising functions as a financing model as much as a distribution model. It allows a profitable, proven business to scale using other people's capital and operational effort, rather than reinvesting every dollar of profit back into growth for years before reaching meaningful scale. A founder who has already been through what a private equity acquisition looks like will recognize the appeal of a growth model that does not require giving up equity or taking on institutional debt to expand.
Who Should and Should Not Buy a Franchise
The instinct that entrepreneurs make the best franchisees turns out to be wrong, and the reason is specific. Entrepreneurs tend to see a system that already works and want to improve, customize, or reinvent it. That instinct, useful when building something from nothing, works against a franchisee whose entire advantage comes from executing a proven playbook precisely.
Military veterans consistently outperform as franchise operators. Handed a system, they execute it, and within a year and a half they are typically asking for the next unit. The discipline to take a playbook and run it without modification is the core skill that produces franchise success, and it is a skill more associated with structured operational backgrounds than entrepreneurial ones.
This has a direct implication for corporate professionals. A director or vice president managing a five to fifteen million dollar budget inside a large company is already running an operation at the scale most franchise units require. The gap is not capability. It is that the skill set has never been applied to an operation the professional owns. Someone running that scale of responsibility for a salary in the low hundreds of thousands could be running a similarly-sized franchise operation and keeping a meaningful share of the profit it generates.
The wealth-building path that makes the most sense for most operators is not a single unit but a stack of units, each one functioning as an additional, largely passive income stream once it is established and properly staffed. The sweet spot tends to land at 10 to 25 units: large enough to constitute a real legacy business worth multiple millions in operating profit, but not so large that it requires the layered management structure of a fully institutionalized operation.
The Resale Advantage Nobody Talks About
One advantage of franchise ownership rarely comes up in comparisons with independent business ownership: liquidity at exit.
Selling an independent business depends heavily on finding a buyer who trusts the specific concept, the specific brand, and often the specific owner's ability to run it. The market for that kind of sale is thin and unpredictable. Selling a unit, or several units, of an established franchise brand is a different proposition entirely. There is an active market of existing franchisees looking to expand their portfolios, private equity buyers who understand the brand and its unit economics, and industry conferences where multi-unit transactions happen regularly. A well-run set of cash-flowing units in a recognized brand attracts buyers in a way that an independent, single-location business typically does not.
There is a related structural observation worth taking seriously: it is genuinely difficult to find a franchise brand that has gone out of existence without significant debt at the corporate level. The distributed ownership model, where individual franchisees bear the operating risk of their own units rather than a single centralized entity bearing all of it at once, produces a kind of resilience that a fully company-owned operation does not have. When one unit struggles, it does not threaten the entire system the way a centralized operational failure can.
Where do members navigating life after a business exit compare notes on what ownership looks like next?
Long Angle is a vetted community where founders and high earners discuss what to build, buy, or invest in after the financial questions get easier. Members include people evaluating franchise ownership, multi-unit operations, and other paths to ownership outside traditional employment. The environment is solicitation-free, with no one in the room trying to sell a specific deal.
The Bigger Picture: Franchising and the Ownership Economy
There is a larger argument underneath the unit economics, and it concerns what happens to white collar work over the next decade.
Roughly 80 to 100 million white collar and light blue collar workers are currently employed in the United States. Even a conservative estimate of 10% job displacement from AI and automation over the next decade represents 10 million college-educated and skilled workers needing a new path forward. Most of these workers have spent their careers inside organizations, managing budgets, leading teams, and delivering results, but few have ever sold a product directly to an end customer or taken on direct execution risk for their own account.
Moving 10 million displaced workers directly into business ownership through acquisition is not realistic. There are not enough businesses for sale, and the capital and operational complexity of acquiring an existing business is a higher bar than most displaced professionals are positioned to clear. Franchising offers a more scalable path: a structured system, a proven playbook, and a support network designed specifically to bring operators who did not start the business into productive ownership.
There are currently roughly 700,000 to 800,000 franchise operator-owners in the US. A meaningful expansion of that base over the next decade, even short of fully absorbing the displacement wave, represents a real shift from an employment-driven economy toward an ownership-driven one. For professionals who sense their current role may not exist in its current form in five or ten years, franchising is one of the more concrete paths available right now to move from being paid for output to owning the output itself. Long Angle members thinking through how to allocate capital across asset classes, including operating businesses alongside public and private market investments, are increasingly factoring ownership vehicles like this into the broader picture.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does franchising work?
A franchisor licenses its brand, operating system, and playbook to a franchisee in exchange for a royalty, typically 5 to 10% of gross revenue. The franchisee operates the business, keeps the majority of revenue after covering their own costs, and receives a protected territory along with ongoing brand and operational support. Licensing agreements typically run for ten years and renew for franchisees who perform well.
What are typical franchise royalty fees?
Royalty fees generally range from 5 to 10% of gross revenue, though the exact rate depends on the brand's specific economics and the level of support provided. Some brands also charge an additional marketing fund contribution, separate from the core royalty.
What type of franchise has the best operating margins?
Service-based franchises in categories like home services, senior care, childcare enrichment, and pet care often post operating margins in the 20 to 30% range. Quick-service restaurants, despite representing the majority of franchise units, tend to run sub-10% margins, making them a less attractive category from a pure unit economics standpoint.
How many franchise units should I own?
A range of 10 to 25 units tends to be the sweet spot for building a substantial, manageable business. At that scale, an owner can build a low-eight-figure operation generating multiple millions in operating profit without requiring the layered management hierarchy that fully institutionalized operations at 50 or 100 units typically need.
Is a franchise better than starting a business from scratch?
It depends on what the owner values. Starting from scratch offers full creative control and no royalty obligation, but requires finding product-market fit, which carries significant execution and market risk. Franchising trades a portion of revenue for a system that has already found product-market fit, along with a built-in support network and a more liquid resale market when it is time to exit.
What makes a good franchisee?
Disciplined operators who can execute an established playbook precisely tend to outperform. Military veterans are frequently cited as strong franchisees because of their ability to take a system and run it without modification. Entrepreneurs, by contrast, often underperform as franchisees because their instinct to customize or reinvent the system works against the model's core advantage of proven, repeatable execution.
Final Thoughts
The version of franchising that shapes public perception, the quick-service restaurant with thin margins and long hours, is real, but it is not the version worth evaluating seriously. The categories with the strongest unit economics, the clearest path to a meaningful wealth-building outcome, and the most realistic exit liquidity look nothing like that image.
For founders and high earners thinking about what comes after a corporate career or a business exit, franchising offers something genuinely uncommon: a scalable, well-supported path into ownership that does not require starting from zero or betting everything on an unproven concept.
Owning the playbook is a different kind of decision than running someone else's.
Long Angle's Trusted Circles are small, confidential peer advisory groups of 6 to 8 members matched by life stage and wealth complexity, meeting monthly with a facilitator who is also a financial professional. For members figuring out what ownership and purpose look like after a business exit or corporate career, a Post-Exit / Next Chapter Circle is designed for exactly this stage.
Watch or Listen
Watch on YouTube · Listen on Spotify · Apple Podcasts · Amazon Music
